Common Defenses Used in Dog Bite Injury Cases

If you have been the victim of a dog bite injury, it is important to understand the common defenses that may be used by the dog owner or their insurance company. In this article, we will explore some of the most common defenses used in dog bite injury cases.

Introduction

Dog bite injury cases can be complex and contentious, especially when it comes to determining liability and fault. In this article, we will explore some of the common defenses used in dog bite injury cases and how they may impact your case.

Provocation

One of the most common defenses used in dog bite injury cases is provocation. The dog owner may argue that you provoked the dog in some way, such as by teasing or taunting it, which led to the bite.

Trespassing

Another common defense is trespassing. The dog owner may argue that you were trespassing on their property at the time of the incident, which may limit their liability for your injuries.

Assumption of Risk

Assumption of risk is another common defense. The dog owner may argue that you assumed the risk of being bitten by the dog by knowingly entering an area where the dog was present.

Contributory Negligence

Contributory negligence is a defense that is often used in dog bite injury cases. The dog owner may argue that your own negligence or actions contributed to the incident, and therefore, they should not be held fully liable for your injuries.

Conclusion

Understanding the common defenses used in dog bite injury lawyer  can help you prepare for your case and ensure that your rights are protected. By working with an experienced dog bite injury lawyer, you can navigate these defenses and seek the compensation you deserve for your injuries.

 

Tags: